« April 2008 | Main | June 2008 »
People Involved Now -- or PIN -- started passing out flyers Monday calling for a two week rotating boycott. The boycott started Monday with Exxon Mobil and Chevron. It will then go to BP and ending up with Shell.
Organizers hope it will affect the profits of those companies and drive down prices.
"If we don't buy, they will have plenty of supply, said Mertus Strong, one of the boycott organizers.
Where to begin? How about: You dunderheads. Petroleum is a world market; buying gas across the street isn't going to change worldwide demand so it's not going to have an effect on anyones profits.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the only way to effect the cost of gasoline is to consume less. That has both a short-term effect -- you use less gas and cut your cost immediately -- and a long-term effect: you decrease, by a few gallons a week, worldwide demand for petroleum.
I know, I know: there are endless pools of oil under Alaska and South Dakota and Brazil, and the only thing that's keeping us from nickel-a-gallon fuel is stupid liberals who hate America. Still, even if we kill all the liberals off tomorrow, it'll take years to get that oil flowing and people are whiny and bitchy about the cost right now -- and I, personally, think we need to do something to shut them up.
Which brings me back to using less fuel, which is what Louisville's pamphleteers ought to be pamphleteering about. But they're not.
I feel the need, before my next pull-quote from the article about PIN, to point out that I'm not making this up.
PIN says if the boycott doesn't drive down prices by the Fourth of July, it will start over again and this time freeze out the oil company stations for three week periods.
Oh yeah; that'll teach those worldwide markets who's boss.
“If anything, the national press corps was probably too deferential to the White House and to the administration in regard to the most important decision facing the nation during my years in Washington, the choice over whether to go to war in Iraq. The collapse of the administration’s rationales for war, which became apparent months after our invasion, should never have come as such a surprise. … In this case, the ‘liberal media’ didn’t live up to its reputation. If it had, the country would have been better served.”I'm leaving comments open so conservatives can complain some more about Dan Rather.